<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Assessment Part III: Number of Newcomers Per Rotation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.aspworldtour.com/2011/10/21/the-assessment-part-iii-number-of-newcomers-per-rotation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.aspworldtour.com/2011/10/21/the-assessment-part-iii-number-of-newcomers-per-rotation/</link>
	<description>ASP World Tour</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 00:05:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samuel</title>
		<link>http://www.aspworldtour.com/2011/10/21/the-assessment-part-iii-number-of-newcomers-per-rotation/comment-page-1/#comment-859</link>
		<dc:creator>Samuel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2011 18:46:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aspworldtour.com/?p=7624#comment-859</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with Cristiano, just think about it...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Cristiano, just think about it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cristiano Duma</title>
		<link>http://www.aspworldtour.com/2011/10/21/the-assessment-part-iii-number-of-newcomers-per-rotation/comment-page-1/#comment-839</link>
		<dc:creator>Cristiano Duma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2011 21:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aspworldtour.com/?p=7624#comment-839</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think you should be even more agressive with the rotations. Instead of a 6 months rotation, make it at every event. It won&#039;t be necessary to have 2 ranking systems, only the one world ranking and only the best 32 are allowed to compete in the wt events, reshuffling and re seeding at every event. A better distribution of prime and star events in between the wt ones would be necessary, but it&#039;s possible. Take a look on CJ&#039;s case. He could be back in the field after azores.. It would be even more dynamic... Just a thought...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you should be even more agressive with the rotations. Instead of a 6 months rotation, make it at every event. It won&#8217;t be necessary to have 2 ranking systems, only the one world ranking and only the best 32 are allowed to compete in the wt events, reshuffling and re seeding at every event. A better distribution of prime and star events in between the wt ones would be necessary, but it&#8217;s possible. Take a look on CJ&#8217;s case. He could be back in the field after azores.. It would be even more dynamic&#8230; Just a thought&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Sterzenbach</title>
		<link>http://www.aspworldtour.com/2011/10/21/the-assessment-part-iii-number-of-newcomers-per-rotation/comment-page-1/#comment-832</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Sterzenbach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2011 06:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aspworldtour.com/?p=7624#comment-832</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why bother with this useless discussion...let&#039;s get this sport off the net and into ESPN or similar, after all the surf industry companies are making a killing, and considering the days when Occy was a grom where the contest winnings bought a condo in Sydney, so really it has all gone backwards, and the effort and innovation required to win contests is more than these ASP explanations...pay the guys (and surely the women - better than most guys) rewards matching their effort...I love the sport, so I want to see the continuous innovation and advancement for all involved.  From Hawaii (a great place to live)...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why bother with this useless discussion&#8230;let&#8217;s get this sport off the net and into ESPN or similar, after all the surf industry companies are making a killing, and considering the days when Occy was a grom where the contest winnings bought a condo in Sydney, so really it has all gone backwards, and the effort and innovation required to win contests is more than these ASP explanations&#8230;pay the guys (and surely the women &#8211; better than most guys) rewards matching their effort&#8230;I love the sport, so I want to see the continuous innovation and advancement for all involved.  From Hawaii (a great place to live)&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.aspworldtour.com/2011/10/21/the-assessment-part-iii-number-of-newcomers-per-rotation/comment-page-1/#comment-829</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 18:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aspworldtour.com/?p=7624#comment-829</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I do support reducing the field to 34 and retooling the format to complete events in three days. Wise. I also like the round 4 three man shred fest; it definitely makes the action hotter at a point in the event that makes sense. I think it&#039;s a great idea to create a format that makes it requisite for top CT surfers to attend QS events; their presence at such is a bon in every way. I love the positive spirit of competition and the levels it pushes people to. But...

 ... who are you really serving with this euphemistic &quot;rotation&quot; and why? This new addition seems awfully cannibalistic. The stress levels it places on athletes, most of whom are not paid well, isn&#039;t necessary and only reinforces a selfishness that is already a serious problem in the world of surfing. What is best for the spectators (most of whom do not surf and likely never will) is not necessarily in the best interest of the surfers or surfing. The only thing that really sells surfing is great surfers in great waves. All the silly &quot;tactics&quot; and mind games the ASP is playing with itself is distracting, unnecessary, and appears to be contrary to acceptable behavior in local lineups, which has been making going surfing for people who live the lifestyle increasingly unpleasant. 
 Slater&#039;s dual heat format was infinitely more interesting to watch. Why you chose not to implement it more often is a mystery not only to me but to most of my friends, several of whom are among the more well known and respected surfers anywhere in CA and beyond.

 Medina would have gone on to blow minds and win events on the CT with or without this &quot;rotation.&quot; People will remember 2010&#039;s bomb fest much longer than 2011&#039;s final day of flyboy groveling (which is in no way intended to diminish the abilities of those who advanced).

 I think it&#039;s great that you are constantly taking creative approaches to figure out how to best promote the sport and I know that it is no easy feat to do so without possibly stepping on what makes the act so precious. But that is what needs to be considered above all else: at what point do we diminish the joy of what we love and devote our lives to in order to profit from it? In my opinion you guys have jumped the shark on this one. Careful you don&#039;t fall in the tank and get eaten by your own show.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do support reducing the field to 34 and retooling the format to complete events in three days. Wise. I also like the round 4 three man shred fest; it definitely makes the action hotter at a point in the event that makes sense. I think it&#8217;s a great idea to create a format that makes it requisite for top CT surfers to attend QS events; their presence at such is a bon in every way. I love the positive spirit of competition and the levels it pushes people to. But&#8230;</p>
<p> &#8230; who are you really serving with this euphemistic &#8220;rotation&#8221; and why? This new addition seems awfully cannibalistic. The stress levels it places on athletes, most of whom are not paid well, isn&#8217;t necessary and only reinforces a selfishness that is already a serious problem in the world of surfing. What is best for the spectators (most of whom do not surf and likely never will) is not necessarily in the best interest of the surfers or surfing. The only thing that really sells surfing is great surfers in great waves. All the silly &#8220;tactics&#8221; and mind games the ASP is playing with itself is distracting, unnecessary, and appears to be contrary to acceptable behavior in local lineups, which has been making going surfing for people who live the lifestyle increasingly unpleasant.<br />
 Slater&#8217;s dual heat format was infinitely more interesting to watch. Why you chose not to implement it more often is a mystery not only to me but to most of my friends, several of whom are among the more well known and respected surfers anywhere in CA and beyond.</p>
<p> Medina would have gone on to blow minds and win events on the CT with or without this &#8220;rotation.&#8221; People will remember 2010&#8242;s bomb fest much longer than 2011&#8242;s final day of flyboy groveling (which is in no way intended to diminish the abilities of those who advanced).</p>
<p> I think it&#8217;s great that you are constantly taking creative approaches to figure out how to best promote the sport and I know that it is no easy feat to do so without possibly stepping on what makes the act so precious. But that is what needs to be considered above all else: at what point do we diminish the joy of what we love and devote our lives to in order to profit from it? In my opinion you guys have jumped the shark on this one. Careful you don&#8217;t fall in the tank and get eaten by your own show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Schiller</title>
		<link>http://www.aspworldtour.com/2011/10/21/the-assessment-part-iii-number-of-newcomers-per-rotation/comment-page-1/#comment-827</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Schiller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 13:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aspworldtour.com/?p=7624#comment-827</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why did this require three seperate posts?  You guys look desperate to get people back here.  Excellent reading, stop milking it though.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why did this require three seperate posts?  You guys look desperate to get people back here.  Excellent reading, stop milking it though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://www.aspworldtour.com/2011/10/21/the-assessment-part-iii-number-of-newcomers-per-rotation/comment-page-1/#comment-824</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 09:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aspworldtour.com/?p=7624#comment-824</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[eliteism... The politics of this sport is mind boggling.. Keep it simple stupid..  Cut offs, 2 tier, big corps, blah blah .. Try to tell me Otts pit wasn&#039;t the highlight of the event. Thats what we all tune in for..
F*#%  all the tricks and theatrics and the ridiculous claims &amp; turkeys in the booth ,my only beef is i chewed up all my monthly data allowance in two days viewing..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>eliteism&#8230; The politics of this sport is mind boggling.. Keep it simple stupid..  Cut offs, 2 tier, big corps, blah blah .. Try to tell me Otts pit wasn&#8217;t the highlight of the event. Thats what we all tune in for..<br />
F*#%  all the tricks and theatrics and the ridiculous claims &amp; turkeys in the booth ,my only beef is i chewed up all my monthly data allowance in two days viewing..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
