<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Assessment In Full: A Look at the ASP World Tour&#8217;s Transition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.aspworldtour.com/2011/10/24/the-assessment-in-full-a-look-at-the-asp-world-tours-transition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.aspworldtour.com/2011/10/24/the-assessment-in-full-a-look-at-the-asp-world-tours-transition/</link>
	<description>ASP World Tour</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 18:11:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uncle Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.aspworldtour.com/2011/10/24/the-assessment-in-full-a-look-at-the-asp-world-tours-transition/comment-page-1/#comment-914</link>
		<dc:creator>Uncle Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 21:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aspworldtour.com/?p=7644#comment-914</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Drug screen? It&#039;s surfing, noone cares if a doob gets sparke now and then and roids are&#039;nt gonna help a surfer. Please...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Drug screen? It&#8217;s surfing, noone cares if a doob gets sparke now and then and roids are&#8217;nt gonna help a surfer. Please&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.aspworldtour.com/2011/10/24/the-assessment-in-full-a-look-at-the-asp-world-tours-transition/comment-page-1/#comment-911</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 17:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aspworldtour.com/?p=7644#comment-911</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Totally on the money with this. 

The ASP was on the mark trending towards simplifying the format by reducing the field but the mid-year cut is totally contrary to this: it is an unnecessary complication that can work against the intention of keeping the best guys on tour. AJ&#039;s examples of some of the best surfers who would not have re-qualified under this new format is spot-on. 

SIMPLIFY, SIMPLIFY, SIMPLIFY. 

The ASP is creating unnecessary static in this regard. It&#039;s like you just made a Porsche and decided to dress it with mud bogger tires. You should just avoid the mud altogether.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally on the money with this. </p>
<p>The ASP was on the mark trending towards simplifying the format by reducing the field but the mid-year cut is totally contrary to this: it is an unnecessary complication that can work against the intention of keeping the best guys on tour. AJ&#8217;s examples of some of the best surfers who would not have re-qualified under this new format is spot-on. </p>
<p>SIMPLIFY, SIMPLIFY, SIMPLIFY. </p>
<p>The ASP is creating unnecessary static in this regard. It&#8217;s like you just made a Porsche and decided to dress it with mud bogger tires. You should just avoid the mud altogether.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.aspworldtour.com/2011/10/24/the-assessment-in-full-a-look-at-the-asp-world-tours-transition/comment-page-1/#comment-908</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 16:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aspworldtour.com/?p=7644#comment-908</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The fact that you guys have to continually justify this move should be enough indication that you pulled a boner. And harping on the Medina win as &quot;proof&quot; of anything is proof of nothing. The ASP has seen plenty of rookies and youngsters blow everyone away regardless of format. Medina obviously has the talent to win and the new &quot;rotation&quot; only made that happen sooner as opposed to later. Plus, had the conditions been firing barrels instead of crap that clearly favored his background I doubt he would have gotten past Slater. He sure didn&#039;t impress in kegging Supertubos.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact that you guys have to continually justify this move should be enough indication that you pulled a boner. And harping on the Medina win as &#8220;proof&#8221; of anything is proof of nothing. The ASP has seen plenty of rookies and youngsters blow everyone away regardless of format. Medina obviously has the talent to win and the new &#8220;rotation&#8221; only made that happen sooner as opposed to later. Plus, had the conditions been firing barrels instead of crap that clearly favored his background I doubt he would have gotten past Slater. He sure didn&#8217;t impress in kegging Supertubos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Longman</title>
		<link>http://www.aspworldtour.com/2011/10/24/the-assessment-in-full-a-look-at-the-asp-world-tours-transition/comment-page-1/#comment-906</link>
		<dc:creator>David Longman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 17:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aspworldtour.com/?p=7644#comment-906</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I guess it is published somewhere, but I wonder what the goal of the ASP is - the five year plan. I don&#039;t expect that anyone other than the surfers and sponsors should be made aware of this. But that vision and plan does shape how surfing is going to develop. 

Much though it might be hard for the purists to accept, but prize money can only come from sponsors and advertising revenue - that includes some venues seeing the arrival of an ASP event being good for tourism etc. If the sport wants money money to fund more prizes across more competitions, it has to be commercial at some level and listen to those pipers.

As I said before, there is nothing wrong with promotion and relegation from different divisions. Everyone tuning in to see a World event, expects and wants to see the best. The better the &#039;second division&#039; gets, more viewers on the web will tune in. And so the money grows. 

One of the aspects of the changes to be taken note of for all is that events now are not straight knock-out as they tended to be before. So, as a rookie, you don&#039;t have just the one heat and if you don&#039;t win you don&#039;t go home. You can also go to the break a week or more before, and have probably been before over the years.

To answer the point from Redsman, that&#039;s my choice whether to watch or not. Every year for the past eight years I have flown to Oahu to see the Pipe Masters, have bought the gear, brought revenue to the area etc. Yes, I&#039;m in my 50s, but that&#039;s not the point. Ever sport needs its stars, and that&#039;s down to marketing, PR and promotion.

Kelly&#039;s 10 titles last year hardly got a mention in the UK mainstream media. If Kelly can&#039;t pull the media exposure for surfing, then who can.

Surfing has a huge story with KS. It has a great &#039;best of format&#039; for events, some incredible locations. Yes, it is on the way up, but is still a long way off being mainstream. The death of Andy scored quite well in the UK media, but it&#039;s not the story that surfing needs.

I guess most replying to this - and other stories - are rightly surfing purists. I was first on boards 50 years ago and still surf. The purists may look at things differently to me. Rights. Lefts. Beach. Reef. To me, if you are the best you will break through. The best are the best because they can do it all.

My point - perhaps partly attached to the wrong story - is that the rotation is positive, it creates more competition, and the event formats focus on seeing the best more often.

So, well done. 

But the ASP needs to look at more innovations by way of competitions. Obvious ones include a &#039;made for TV&#039; series with the top 10 surfers, and within the World Tour having the surfers representing the USA, South America, Australia and Rest of the World in a &#039;World Series&#039; cup?

David]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess it is published somewhere, but I wonder what the goal of the ASP is &#8211; the five year plan. I don&#8217;t expect that anyone other than the surfers and sponsors should be made aware of this. But that vision and plan does shape how surfing is going to develop. </p>
<p>Much though it might be hard for the purists to accept, but prize money can only come from sponsors and advertising revenue &#8211; that includes some venues seeing the arrival of an ASP event being good for tourism etc. If the sport wants money money to fund more prizes across more competitions, it has to be commercial at some level and listen to those pipers.</p>
<p>As I said before, there is nothing wrong with promotion and relegation from different divisions. Everyone tuning in to see a World event, expects and wants to see the best. The better the &#8216;second division&#8217; gets, more viewers on the web will tune in. And so the money grows. </p>
<p>One of the aspects of the changes to be taken note of for all is that events now are not straight knock-out as they tended to be before. So, as a rookie, you don&#8217;t have just the one heat and if you don&#8217;t win you don&#8217;t go home. You can also go to the break a week or more before, and have probably been before over the years.</p>
<p>To answer the point from Redsman, that&#8217;s my choice whether to watch or not. Every year for the past eight years I have flown to Oahu to see the Pipe Masters, have bought the gear, brought revenue to the area etc. Yes, I&#8217;m in my 50s, but that&#8217;s not the point. Ever sport needs its stars, and that&#8217;s down to marketing, PR and promotion.</p>
<p>Kelly&#8217;s 10 titles last year hardly got a mention in the UK mainstream media. If Kelly can&#8217;t pull the media exposure for surfing, then who can.</p>
<p>Surfing has a huge story with KS. It has a great &#8216;best of format&#8217; for events, some incredible locations. Yes, it is on the way up, but is still a long way off being mainstream. The death of Andy scored quite well in the UK media, but it&#8217;s not the story that surfing needs.</p>
<p>I guess most replying to this &#8211; and other stories &#8211; are rightly surfing purists. I was first on boards 50 years ago and still surf. The purists may look at things differently to me. Rights. Lefts. Beach. Reef. To me, if you are the best you will break through. The best are the best because they can do it all.</p>
<p>My point &#8211; perhaps partly attached to the wrong story &#8211; is that the rotation is positive, it creates more competition, and the event formats focus on seeing the best more often.</p>
<p>So, well done. </p>
<p>But the ASP needs to look at more innovations by way of competitions. Obvious ones include a &#8216;made for TV&#8217; series with the top 10 surfers, and within the World Tour having the surfers representing the USA, South America, Australia and Rest of the World in a &#8216;World Series&#8217; cup?</p>
<p>David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AJ</title>
		<link>http://www.aspworldtour.com/2011/10/24/the-assessment-in-full-a-look-at-the-asp-world-tours-transition/comment-page-1/#comment-903</link>
		<dc:creator>AJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 00:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aspworldtour.com/?p=7644#comment-903</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite all the changes which were made to the ASP world tour basically all the benefits which are mentioned in the article can be attributed to one of the changes-cutting the tour down to 34 members. In the old system the disparity between the top 10 surfers and the bottom 10 was huge and this has certainly rectified this... but the benefits of the new system for me ends right there. 
The mid year cut-off/one world ranking doesn&#039;t make sense for a stack of reasons. Firstly there is no doubt that the world tour or the old CT is a completely different level of competition, a level of competition which takes just about every surfer time to adjust to regardless of their abilities on a wave. Despite this well known fact the asp are kicking surfers off tour after only 5 events before many of the surfers have found their feet competing on the dream tour. Furthermore the world tour is not a homogeneous series of waves and competitions-and neither are the surfers on tour all the same; out of the first 5 events 3 are right hand point breaks. If these waves aren&#039;t your favoured waves on tour you could be off before you even get to prove yourself at the other tour stops.
The Asps answer to this... they can always go surf primes. How are people meant to concentrate on their often rookie year on tour if they are flying off to brazil or some other corner of the world every other week to surf slop trying to get points just to stay on tour. Sure Gabriel Medina adjusted fine in the first 6 months.. but lets look at other names who didn&#039;t Andy Irons, Dane Reynolds, Jordy Smith- and there are a heap of other surfers clearly worthy of a spot on tour who would have been knocked off after 6 months, besides the surfers who make it on at the halfway point would most likely have qualified anyway at the end of the year and should remain part of the ongoing competition on the QS until the end of the year.
The &#039;better locations&#039; quote... maybe better in terms of endorsements but wave quality- so we traded Fiji for new york and we traded ulus/padang padang, mexico, el gringo or reunion island (take your pick) for san francisco and this is better-let alone the disparity in geographic locations of the competitions?
If the asp wants to hype surfing then it shouldn&#039;t be to sell out the &#039;worlds best surfers worlds best waves concept&#039; just put the prime events (which are in rubbish surf anyway generally) in new york and san fran and put your endorsement money into the prize pool-that will be enough to attract the big names anyway-besides lets face it KS, mick taj owen etc aren&#039;t turning up to primes for the points anyway.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite all the changes which were made to the ASP world tour basically all the benefits which are mentioned in the article can be attributed to one of the changes-cutting the tour down to 34 members. In the old system the disparity between the top 10 surfers and the bottom 10 was huge and this has certainly rectified this&#8230; but the benefits of the new system for me ends right there.<br />
The mid year cut-off/one world ranking doesn&#8217;t make sense for a stack of reasons. Firstly there is no doubt that the world tour or the old CT is a completely different level of competition, a level of competition which takes just about every surfer time to adjust to regardless of their abilities on a wave. Despite this well known fact the asp are kicking surfers off tour after only 5 events before many of the surfers have found their feet competing on the dream tour. Furthermore the world tour is not a homogeneous series of waves and competitions-and neither are the surfers on tour all the same; out of the first 5 events 3 are right hand point breaks. If these waves aren&#8217;t your favoured waves on tour you could be off before you even get to prove yourself at the other tour stops.<br />
The Asps answer to this&#8230; they can always go surf primes. How are people meant to concentrate on their often rookie year on tour if they are flying off to brazil or some other corner of the world every other week to surf slop trying to get points just to stay on tour. Sure Gabriel Medina adjusted fine in the first 6 months.. but lets look at other names who didn&#8217;t Andy Irons, Dane Reynolds, Jordy Smith- and there are a heap of other surfers clearly worthy of a spot on tour who would have been knocked off after 6 months, besides the surfers who make it on at the halfway point would most likely have qualified anyway at the end of the year and should remain part of the ongoing competition on the QS until the end of the year.<br />
The &#8216;better locations&#8217; quote&#8230; maybe better in terms of endorsements but wave quality- so we traded Fiji for new york and we traded ulus/padang padang, mexico, el gringo or reunion island (take your pick) for san francisco and this is better-let alone the disparity in geographic locations of the competitions?<br />
If the asp wants to hype surfing then it shouldn&#8217;t be to sell out the &#8216;worlds best surfers worlds best waves concept&#8217; just put the prime events (which are in rubbish surf anyway generally) in new york and san fran and put your endorsement money into the prize pool-that will be enough to attract the big names anyway-besides lets face it KS, mick taj owen etc aren&#8217;t turning up to primes for the points anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drum lowe</title>
		<link>http://www.aspworldtour.com/2011/10/24/the-assessment-in-full-a-look-at-the-asp-world-tours-transition/comment-page-1/#comment-898</link>
		<dc:creator>drum lowe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 08:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aspworldtour.com/?p=7644#comment-898</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Redsman</title>
		<link>http://www.aspworldtour.com/2011/10/24/the-assessment-in-full-a-look-at-the-asp-world-tours-transition/comment-page-1/#comment-894</link>
		<dc:creator>Redsman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 07:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aspworldtour.com/?p=7644#comment-894</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kellys a great athlete and I think will prbly continue to be involved in professional surfing for long time to come - whether as surfer or administrator.

But to say you dont watch cause he&#039;s not surfing shows you may not fit into the target market for these company(s) in any case...

KS is awesome three generations of surfers he has outsurfed and continues to - but I&#039;m sure the sport will continue to thrive even without him competing - imagine a young kid having him as a coach or &#039;mentor&#039; - like Parko has with Luke Egan - except the guys has WON 10+ CTs and knows every break inside and out and knows equipment better than most...

Wouldnt be surprised to see Kelly go down this path IF he ever retires from CT.....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kellys a great athlete and I think will prbly continue to be involved in professional surfing for long time to come &#8211; whether as surfer or administrator.</p>
<p>But to say you dont watch cause he&#8217;s not surfing shows you may not fit into the target market for these company(s) in any case&#8230;</p>
<p>KS is awesome three generations of surfers he has outsurfed and continues to &#8211; but I&#8217;m sure the sport will continue to thrive even without him competing &#8211; imagine a young kid having him as a coach or &#8216;mentor&#8217; &#8211; like Parko has with Luke Egan &#8211; except the guys has WON 10+ CTs and knows every break inside and out and knows equipment better than most&#8230;</p>
<p>Wouldnt be surprised to see Kelly go down this path IF he ever retires from CT&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mik</title>
		<link>http://www.aspworldtour.com/2011/10/24/the-assessment-in-full-a-look-at-the-asp-world-tours-transition/comment-page-1/#comment-893</link>
		<dc:creator>Mik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 05:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aspworldtour.com/?p=7644#comment-893</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As much as I admire Kelly, the WTC is still going to be rad w/o him. Someone will step up. He wont have the same run. but it will be exciting every time, as long as the waves are compelling. No one is irreplaceable. Before him it was Tom Curren, and he may still be an icon, but he is not even thought of much because surfing has taken his best, and moved upwards. As for the rotation, I don&#039;t like it. In fact I think it is counter-productive, because it usually takes a new-comer to the top 34 a year or two to figure it out. So the new standard is actually fairly insular to the top 16. Those guys are very consistent and they will stay up there unless e newcomers are groomed for at least a year. It takes so much effort to get there, it is unfair to not even get a chance to acclimate. So I&#039;m with Bobby Martinez on this one. Not down with how he expressed his opinion, but definitely down with the opinion itself.  And I am also down with surfing isolated places where the waves are world class: Lances Right, Cloudbreak, Uluwatu, Nias, Honolua Bay, Jeffries Bay. Maybe not Bells. That wave&#039;s too flat... (got it, MR?).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As much as I admire Kelly, the WTC is still going to be rad w/o him. Someone will step up. He wont have the same run. but it will be exciting every time, as long as the waves are compelling. No one is irreplaceable. Before him it was Tom Curren, and he may still be an icon, but he is not even thought of much because surfing has taken his best, and moved upwards. As for the rotation, I don&#8217;t like it. In fact I think it is counter-productive, because it usually takes a new-comer to the top 34 a year or two to figure it out. So the new standard is actually fairly insular to the top 16. Those guys are very consistent and they will stay up there unless e newcomers are groomed for at least a year. It takes so much effort to get there, it is unfair to not even get a chance to acclimate. So I&#8217;m with Bobby Martinez on this one. Not down with how he expressed his opinion, but definitely down with the opinion itself.  And I am also down with surfing isolated places where the waves are world class: Lances Right, Cloudbreak, Uluwatu, Nias, Honolua Bay, Jeffries Bay. Maybe not Bells. That wave&#8217;s too flat&#8230; (got it, MR?).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Carlos</title>
		<link>http://www.aspworldtour.com/2011/10/24/the-assessment-in-full-a-look-at-the-asp-world-tours-transition/comment-page-1/#comment-890</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Carlos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 02:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aspworldtour.com/?p=7644#comment-890</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ASP: Goofy vs. Regular
 
Favoritism, injustice, lack of vision, commercialism or a regular foot conspiracy?
 
Being a goofy footer, I question the world tour schedule/rotation a lot, and after the Bobby Martinez incident, I feel compelled to write about it.
 
First let’s analyze this new midyear rotation or ‘cut off’.

During the first half of the 2011 ASP year, before the rotation, surfers have to surf 3 right points(high perfomance), 2 beach breaks and 1 left.

Even a blind person can see that this scenario favors regular foots.
 
If that wasn’t bad enough, for the second half of the year, the tour has 3 beach breaks and 2 reef breaks. And although one of these reef breaks (Pipeline) is lefts-only when it’s big, more often than not it’s mostly rights – tricky, down-the-line hard-to-surf-backside Backdoor waves that greatly favor high regular foot scores.

Pipe and Chops as the lefts, cause the type of wave is even better tosurf them backside....
 
So the question is whether the current rankings and even the record of past World Men Champions (8 goofy footers vs. 25 regular) is skewed by an unfair schedule. Are regular footers better than goofy footers? Or is it just the places/waves where they compete?
 
It would be interesting to have the statistics on how the ASP administration and the industry sponsoring them stand, regular or goofy. I happen to know the president of the ASP is a regular foot, 
and the real question is whether this stance is having a subconscious influence on where the contests should be run.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ASP: Goofy vs. Regular</p>
<p>Favoritism, injustice, lack of vision, commercialism or a regular foot conspiracy?</p>
<p>Being a goofy footer, I question the world tour schedule/rotation a lot, and after the Bobby Martinez incident, I feel compelled to write about it.</p>
<p>First let’s analyze this new midyear rotation or ‘cut off’.</p>
<p>During the first half of the 2011 ASP year, before the rotation, surfers have to surf 3 right points(high perfomance), 2 beach breaks and 1 left.</p>
<p>Even a blind person can see that this scenario favors regular foots.</p>
<p>If that wasn’t bad enough, for the second half of the year, the tour has 3 beach breaks and 2 reef breaks. And although one of these reef breaks (Pipeline) is lefts-only when it’s big, more often than not it’s mostly rights – tricky, down-the-line hard-to-surf-backside Backdoor waves that greatly favor high regular foot scores.</p>
<p>Pipe and Chops as the lefts, cause the type of wave is even better tosurf them backside&#8230;.</p>
<p>So the question is whether the current rankings and even the record of past World Men Champions (8 goofy footers vs. 25 regular) is skewed by an unfair schedule. Are regular footers better than goofy footers? Or is it just the places/waves where they compete?</p>
<p>It would be interesting to have the statistics on how the ASP administration and the industry sponsoring them stand, regular or goofy. I happen to know the president of the ASP is a regular foot,<br />
and the real question is whether this stance is having a subconscious influence on where the contests should be run.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Longman</title>
		<link>http://www.aspworldtour.com/2011/10/24/the-assessment-in-full-a-look-at-the-asp-world-tours-transition/comment-page-1/#comment-888</link>
		<dc:creator>David Longman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 00:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aspworldtour.com/?p=7644#comment-888</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Surfing needs to be aware that in KS, the sport has a global star. Without him competing, I suspect the ASP has a problem and knows it. With better event and Quiksilver marketing, if you keep him on tour surfing could get a lot more coverage and thus sponsorship. My wife and I watch in the UK on the web, and with KS not in South Africa, we didn&#039;t tune in. I wonder if the audience data showed any dip for that event? I don&#039;t know how big surfing wants to get. What is the five year target for sponsorship revenues and media coverage?

Many sports have promotion and relegation from the divisions. It&#039;s essential, and the twice-yearly rotation is a brilliant concept. It adds excitement and interest, and helps to create a media story. The &#039;rookie&#039; coming in and doing well creates a buzz for everyone.

Sporting stars these days need to do more than just be a star athlete. They need to be star media performers too - which is where Kelly is again so brilliant. 

The debate will reach fever pitch again in the next few weeks - should KS retire? As a marketing and PR man with 30 years of experience behind him working for some major global brands, surfing and the ASP needs him more than he needs you. There is far more innovation and creativity that needs to go into the ASP&#039;s planning and the creation of new events in the years ahead. Don&#039;t get complacent.

Bring in the new stars. That&#039;s essential. Bring the ladies into events too - surfing &#039;doubles&#039;.  2011 is progress. It&#039;s not the destination. Good luck. Remember one thing. NASCAR, the World Series, NFL etc is televised showbusiness as well as being a sport. For surfing to break through, you&#039;ll need every star, every media story and every gimmick and every trick in the book to get there.

Or perhaps that isn&#039;t the goal?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surfing needs to be aware that in KS, the sport has a global star. Without him competing, I suspect the ASP has a problem and knows it. With better event and Quiksilver marketing, if you keep him on tour surfing could get a lot more coverage and thus sponsorship. My wife and I watch in the UK on the web, and with KS not in South Africa, we didn&#8217;t tune in. I wonder if the audience data showed any dip for that event? I don&#8217;t know how big surfing wants to get. What is the five year target for sponsorship revenues and media coverage?</p>
<p>Many sports have promotion and relegation from the divisions. It&#8217;s essential, and the twice-yearly rotation is a brilliant concept. It adds excitement and interest, and helps to create a media story. The &#8216;rookie&#8217; coming in and doing well creates a buzz for everyone.</p>
<p>Sporting stars these days need to do more than just be a star athlete. They need to be star media performers too &#8211; which is where Kelly is again so brilliant. </p>
<p>The debate will reach fever pitch again in the next few weeks &#8211; should KS retire? As a marketing and PR man with 30 years of experience behind him working for some major global brands, surfing and the ASP needs him more than he needs you. There is far more innovation and creativity that needs to go into the ASP&#8217;s planning and the creation of new events in the years ahead. Don&#8217;t get complacent.</p>
<p>Bring in the new stars. That&#8217;s essential. Bring the ladies into events too &#8211; surfing &#8216;doubles&#8217;.  2011 is progress. It&#8217;s not the destination. Good luck. Remember one thing. NASCAR, the World Series, NFL etc is televised showbusiness as well as being a sport. For surfing to break through, you&#8217;ll need every star, every media story and every gimmick and every trick in the book to get there.</p>
<p>Or perhaps that isn&#8217;t the goal?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
